The Much Vaunted National Health Service©, not content with killing off hospital-bound victims patients, has set its sights a bit lower:
"[MVNHS©] won't pay for child cancer treatment that 'cuts deaths by 25% - Some British parents are taking their children to the US to receive a three-drug treatment"
Question: Why does President Obama hate British children?
The Brits are "refusing to fund a treatment for one of the most common cancers suffered by children." That's actually a bit misleading: under a nationalized health care scheme, "refusing to pay" means "denying treatment to." It's a terrifically (or horrifically, depending on one's perspective) efficient means of rationing care. And, of course, it's exactly how ObamaCare is designed to work.
Oh well, it's just kids, right?
"[MVNHS©] won't pay for child cancer treatment that 'cuts deaths by 25% - Some British parents are taking their children to the US to receive a three-drug treatment"
Question: Why does President Obama hate British children?
The Brits are "refusing to fund a treatment for one of the most common cancers suffered by children." That's actually a bit misleading: under a nationalized health care scheme, "refusing to pay" means "denying treatment to." It's a terrifically (or horrifically, depending on one's perspective) efficient means of rationing care. And, of course, it's exactly how ObamaCare is designed to work.
Oh well, it's just kids, right?
No comments:
Post a Comment